The Institute’s key research themes are led by ten academic partners spread across the UK.

Our nine Productivity Forums are spread across the UK acting as regional ambassadors for the importance of productivity. The Investment in Productive Places campaign helps places understand how their resources can be used more effectively.

Businesses are crucial to solving the UK’s productivity problems.

Working closely with policymakers.

Read and listen to our up-to-the-minute productivity output.

We’re a UK-wide research organisation exploring what productivity means for business

Artificial Intelligence: what drives adoption in EU countries?

This paper uses results from successive waves of the Eurostat survey on ‘ICT usage and ecommerce in enterprises’ to study the determinants of AI adoption in a country/industry/time panel covering 15 countries and 24 industries of the European Union over 2021–2025. We relate adoption to several potential drivers: the perceived obstacles to adoption, the business environment (such as investment in organizational capital), the policy context (such as policies affecting the capabilities and incentives to adopt and use AI technologies) and demography (shares of different age groups within employees). We summarize some of the potential drivers using Principal Components Analyses and take a diff-in-diff approach to highlight how the influence of nation-wide drivers of adoption differs depending on industry exposure to them. We find robust statistical associations of both adoption and the extent of AI use (at least three AI technologies) with mismatch obstacles (data availability, expertise, technological incompatibility, or AI’s perceived lack of usefulness for the firm) whose significance has increased over time, as well as with costs and personal concerns (legal uncertainty, ethical and privacy concerns) whose significance has decreased over time. Human capabilities (such as ICT skills and organizational capital) and innovation policies are positively related to AI adoption, while policies curbing either workforce flexibility or competition in industries that are key providers of intermediate inputs are inversely related to adoption. Finally, we find evidence of an inverted U-curve between workforce age and AI adoption, with adoption being weaker where the age distribution is tilted towards young or elderly workers; however, higher AI exposure in an industry moderates these demographic effects, perhaps due to skill levelling effect of the new technology.

Authors Gilbert Cette, Giuseppe Nicoletti, Océane Vernerey

Themes

  • Knowledge Capital

Published

14/08/2026

Cite

G. Cette, G. Nicoletti, O. Vernerey (2026) Artificial Intelligence: what drives adoption in EU countries?. Working Paper No. 077, The Productivity Institute.

Downloads

WORKING PAPER
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

For more information see our Privacy Policy